Skip to content

Pannell Discussions

Ideas in economics, environment, agriculture, policy and more.

  • Home
  • Previous posts
  • My details
  • Videos
  • Music
  • Links
  • Subscribe
Latest

423. Risk aversion versus loss aversion, part 1

10 July, 202430 June, 2025 by David Pannell7 Min Reading

Risk aversion and loss aversion are two theories of how people make decisions under risk. They overlap in some ways but they also have some

read more
Latest

422. Risky farm decision making as a social process

3 July, 202430 June, 2025 by David Pannell5 Min Reading

Farmers sometimes go through extensive social engagements (conversations, discussions, debates, etc.) in the course of making decisions, especially big risky decisions.  Some fascinating research on

read more
Latest

421. Risk versus uncertainty

26 June, 202430 June, 2025 by David Pannell3 Min Reading

 I want to make a distinction that has been lurking below the surface in some of the previous posts in this RiskWi$e series: risk versus

read more
Latest

420. Systematic decision making under risk

12 June, 202430 June, 2025 by David Pannell7 Min Reading

Intuitive decision making can be good, but as we’ve seen in earlier posts in this series, sometimes it can lead us astray. When faced with

read more
Latest

419. Risk premium

5 June, 202430 June, 2025 by David Pannell4 Min Reading

A risk premium is the psychological cost of putting up with risk, expressed in monetary terms. Or, equivalently, it’s the psychological benefit of avoiding risk,

read more
Latest

418. Hedging to reduce crop price risk

29 May, 202430 June, 2025 by David Pannell6 Min Reading

Grain farmers in Australia (and most other places) make relatively little use of market mechanisms to reduce (“hedge”) price risk. Why is that? Two methods

read more

Posts pagination

Previous 1 2 3 4 … 73 Next

Recent Posts

  • 435. Environmental offsets 3. Risk of failure

    When designing an environmental offset scheme, it is important to account for the probability that an offset project will fail to deliver its intended benefits.

  • 434. Environmental offsets 2. The currency for measuring impacts and benefits

    In an environmental offset scheme, the environmental impacts of a development project and the benefits of an offset project need to be compared quantitatively. To

  • 433. Depicting risk in graphs for farmers

    There are many types of graphs that can depict the riskiness of a decision option. Here I present and comment on some of them. My

  • 432. Environmental offsets 1. Introduction

  • 431. Webinar on economics of urban park designs

  • 430. Polarised public opinion

  • 429. The value of a non-market value

  • 428. Economic analysis of urban park designs

  • 427. Reviews of research on agricultural adoption

  • 426. Music “Option Value”

Archives

  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004

Topics

Recent comments

  • Yugank on 433. Depicting risk in graphs for farmers
  • Frank Ibe on 261 – Agricultural water pollution
  • Cilla de Lacy on 430. Polarised public opinion
  • T Barr on 168 – Telling farmers how to adapt to climate change
  • David Pannell on 427. Reviews of research on agricultural adoption

Recent Posts

  • 435. Environmental offsets 3. Risk of failure 14 July, 2025
  • 434. Environmental offsets 2. The currency for measuring impacts and benefits 7 July, 2025
  • 433. Depicting risk in graphs for farmers 30 June, 2025
  • 432. Environmental offsets 1. Introduction 16 June, 2025
  • 431. Webinar on economics of urban park designs 30 May, 2025
  • 430. Polarised public opinion 26 May, 2025
  • 429. The value of a non-market value 12 March, 2025
  • 428. Economic analysis of urban park designs 10 March, 2025
  • 427. Reviews of research on agricultural adoption 10 December, 2024
  • 426. Music “Option Value” 25 August, 2024

Join our Mailing List

© All Rights Reserved 2020 Theme: Prefer by Template Sell.